女专家写的就是贴切,文字优美,大快人心!
- CodingMouse 财富等级:
|
|
昨天刚到成都西南书城购买的这本书,感觉图灵推荐的书就是相当精典。清华、邮电、机工的红皮书我都翻阅过,感觉大多是陈词滥调,让我这种初学者感觉太教条化,不容易理解。后来发现这本书,这绝对是一本学习OO的首选书籍。
|
|
此评论对你有用
没用
|
| |
|
一本优秀的JAVA书籍,值得像任何人推荐
- woaixiangcao 财富等级:
|
|
如果你刚开始学习,对JAVA面向对象编程语言的种种机制感到迷惑不解的话,这本书将是你的救星,这本书的讲述不仅非常的专业、深入而且教学方式就像妈妈教孩子学习1、2、3、一样的简单,我力荐这本书,它不仅仅使你快速的理解和掌握JAVA知识而且也将带给你以后进行企业级开发的一个正确的开始。
|
|
此评论对你有用
没用
|
| |
|
【翻译】请把这本书与Knuth及GoF的书放在一起
- tigerchamp 财富等级:
|
【原书链接】 http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1932394230/sr=1-1/qid=1155780761/ref=sr_1_1/104-5159438-8783902?ie=UTF8&s=books 【原书评内容】 This isnt necessarily the best introduction for absolute beginners (I would recommend /Pragmatic Unit Testing/ for that), but it is required reading for server-side Java, as most other reviewers have pointed out. But its more than that--its one of those rare computer books that transcends its subject matter. Why? Because it can make you a better programmer. While some of the credit can rightly be given to unit testing and Test-Driven Development in general, Rainsbergers book makes you /see/ better ways to write and refactor your code. The breadth and depth of examples is astonishing--he convincingly shatters 'but its too hard to test that' arguments with well-researched, non-trivial examples. In fact, Id say that this is almost a better J2EE tutorial than most books about J2EE proper. Im withholding a star for one reason: the book doesnt cover GUI testing tools like Jemmy, JFCUnit, or Abbot/Costello. These JUnit extensions are ripe for a book with this depth; its just too bad that this couldnt be that book. Other than that, I find that I turn to Rainsbergers book far more often than any other testing book or online reference. 【翻译书评】 这不是一本初学者的必备书(我向他们推荐《Pragmatic Unit Testing》),但却是服务端Java开发的必读书目,正象很多其他的读者说的那样。不仅如此,它是一本少有的超越了其内容主旨的计算机类书籍。为什么这么说呢?因为它会让你成为一个更好的程序员。虽然这要部分地归功于单元测试及测试驱动开发模式,但Rainsberger的书会让你了解怎样才能更好地编写或重构你的代码。书中范例的广度及深度令人赞叹--他用精心设计的,非凡的用例令人信服地粉碎了那些“这些几乎无法测试”的观点。事实上,我要说,这几乎是一本比那些严格意义上的J2EE类书籍更好的J2EE教程。 我只给了4星,是因为书里没有涵盖GUI测试工具,象Jemmy, JFCUnit, 或者Abbot/Costello。这些JUnit的扩展应该被加入到象这种深度的书里,而这本书没有,这实在是太遗憾了。除此之外,我使用这本书的频率远比其他测试书籍及在线参考多得多。 【译者】Tigerchamp(http://www.pball.cn)
|
|
此评论对你有用
没用
|
| |
|
|
|
Beginning Java Objects中文版从概念到代码(第2版)
- lllwwt 财富等级:
|
|
很好 书里面的讲解很形象~
|
|
此评论对你有用
没用
|
| |
|
一本不错的书
- ben0133 财富等级:
|
|
很不错的书,作者由浅入深讲解的非常详细,无论你是初学者还是有多年经验的开发者,都会从中受益的。
|
|
此评论对你有用
没用
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
good
- xiaoniao521 财富等级:
|
Very good coverage of an extremely complex topic, March 3, 2001 Reviewer: Benjamin Mofaz (Tel Aviv, Israel) - See all my reviews When people who have not previously done object-oriented programming begin to learn Java, my experience has been that they mistakenly assume that learning the language itself is the only thing that they need to do. In reality, the most important thing (and in my opinion most difficult) is to learn how to create a good object-oriented design. Before they can create a good design, they need to understand object-oriented concepts and the tools that are available to them such as UML. Jacquies book does an excellent job of introducing the reader to those concepts and explaining them clearly. It has been said that you cannot explain something well to another person unless you really understand it yourself. If that is the case, Ms. Barker clearly understands object design very well. If you are learning Java or considering learning Java for the first time, I recommend reading these books in the following order:
Beginning Java 2 (Ivor Horton)
Professional Java Programming (Brett Spell)
Beginning Java Objects (Jacquie Barker)
These three Wrox titles complement one another very well, and are all well-written and easy to understand.
|
|
此评论对你有用
没用
|
| |
|
太太好的书了
- 222.172.220.*
|
|
这本书对于我们这样对oo语言的各种复杂运用迷惑的人来说是再好不过的指导性书.当然对知识的介绍不是那种很全面的,了解这些建议看JAVA编程思想或java核心技术卷.
|
|
此评论对你有用
没用
|
| |
|
【翻译】一本用java来讲解面向对象设计的书
- flasherfffff 财富等级: 
|
【原文】 I got this book from reading the user recomendations here. I just want to warn people this book is about 900 pages long, and the whole book goes into making just one program (a student registration program for a university). If you have the patience to read a book like this, fine, but for me its a little too drawn out, and nothing I saw thumbing through the chapters jumped out as being interesting or trying to make a point. I have read 'Head First Java' and recommend that book for someone who is trying to make sense of OOP.
Edit: I want to update this review by saying that I was too rash in critisizing this book. This book does do a good job of explaining how to plan and organize object oriented constructs to address real world problems rather than just a nuts and bolts overview of OO syntax that most other Java books give. This book however is not a 'how to program in Java' book. You are going to have to move on to other Java books to become proficient in coding.
【翻译】 我看了读者们在这里(amazon)的推荐,才买了这本书。我只想提醒大家,这本书大约有900页,整本书只讲解了一个程序(一个大学生注册程序)。如果你有耐心读完这本如此之厚的书,那很好,但是对我来说,读这本书让我精疲力尽,并且没有得到任何有用的东西,没有任何趣味。我已经读过《Head First Java》,并且推荐面向对象的初学者看这本书。 编后:我想重新解释一下我的评论,上面的批评确实失于轻率。这本书的确很清晰明了的解释了如何组织面向对象架构来解决现实问题,这比那些只是囫囵吞枣的解释面向对象语法的java书籍好多了。然而,这本书不是教你如何写java程序。如果想精通java编程,还是要看看其他关于java的书的。
|
|
此评论对你有用
没用
|
| |
|
【翻译】这本书带来了全部
- tigerchamp 财富等级:
|
【原书链接】 http://www.amazon.com/Beginning-Java-Objects-Concepts-Second/dp/1590594576/sr=1-2/qid=1162882191/ref=pd_bbs_sr_2/103-4901794-2076652?ie=UTF8&s=books 【原书评内容】 I had the first edition of Beginning Java Objects From Concepts to Code sitting on my bookshelf for about 4 years. Meanwhile, Ive taken several different Java training courses ranging from beginner to advanced level. Ive been part of a development team, and although my role has generally been more of a business subject matter expert, I have also gotten my hands dirty and done some large chunks of coding, debugging, and refactoring other peoples code. So whats my point? Well, although Ive gotten by well enough in a pretty intense OO/Java environment, Ive always felt like it was exactly that - getting by. I finally took this book off the shelf and worked my way through ALL of it over the last couple of weeks, and it really pulled things together for me in a way that nothing else has done. Ive read about half of Eckels Thinking in Java (a couple of times), and most of Deitels Java How to Program, among others, and theyre really great at what they do, but I wish I had worked through ALL of this book before (or at the same time as) reading those. Even though I already had a good understanding of Java syntax, this book helped me understand more than just the syntax of 'System.out.println()'. Ive seen a couple of reviewers comment on Jacquie Barkers friendly tone, and I certainly agree with those reviewers. I felt like she was a trusted colleague helping me along, but not talking down at all. 【翻译书评】 这本书的第一版已经在我的书架上呆了差不多4年时间。同时,我还参加过各种不同的Java培训班,从入门到高级。我在一个开发团队里工作,虽然的我角色更多的是一个业务专家,但我也亲自参与开发,包括一些程序主干的编码,调试,以及对别人的代码进行重构。 那么我对本书的看法呢?嗯,虽然我在一个相当严格的OO/Java语法环境下混得还不错,但我始终觉得自己其实不过是在“混”而已。最终,我把这本书从书架上拿了下来,在过去的几个星期里,从头到尾地研究了一遍,这本书帮我将所有的知识都串联起来了,用一种前所未有的方式。我曾经读过约半本Eckel的《Thinking in Java》(好几次),大部分Deitel的《Java How to Program》,相对其他的书而言,它们都很不错,但我仍然希望我在读它们之前曾经通读过这本书,或者是同时。即使我已经对Java的语法有了很好的了解,这本书还是让我懂得了更多,而不仅仅是象'System.out.println()'这样的语法本身。 我看到了一些对本书的好评,我很同意他们的看法。我觉得Jacquie Barker就象是一个值得依赖的,可以随时提供帮助的同事,而不那些居高临下,指手画脚的家伙。 【译者】Tigerchamp(http://www.pball.cn)
|
|
此评论对你有用
没用
|
| |
|
【翻译】全新角度的Java教科书
- tigerchamp 财富等级:
|
【原书链接】 http://www.amazon.com/Beginning-Java-Objects-Concepts-Second/dp/1590594576/sr=1-2/qid=1162882191/ref=pd_bbs_sr_2/103-4901794-2076652?ie=UTF8&s=books 【原书评内容】 Teaching object oriented programming is tough. Some of the programmers I have worked with talked a good object game but then created library code as objects. I like how this book tries to teach OO from a different angle. I have some issues with the production of the book. In particular I think the balloon metaphor was overused. If you are looking on a different take on teaching Java you might also want to look at 'Head First Java'. 【翻译书评】 教授面向对象编程是困难的。一些曾经和我一起工作过的程序员,他们可以把理论说得很漂亮,但实际上写出的代码仍然是一些函数库,而非对象。我喜欢这本书从另一个角度来教授面向对象的方式。但我觉得它的编写有些问题,尤其是书中过于频繁地使用气球作为比喻。 如果你正在考虑采用另一种方式教授Java, 你可能还需要看看《Head First Java》。 【译者】Tigerchamp(http://www.pball.cn)
|
|
此评论对你有用
没用
|
| |
|
Beginning Java Objects中文版 翻译书评
- luyanfei78 财富等级:
|
【原书评内容】 Very good coverage of an extremely complex topic, March 3, 2001 Reviewer: Benjamin Mofaz (Tel Aviv, Israel) - See all my reviews When people who have not previously done object-oriented programming begin to learn Java, my experience has been that they mistakenly assume that learning the language itself is the only thing that they need to do. In reality, the most important thing (and in my opinion most difficult) is to learn how to create a good object-oriented design. Before they can create a good design, they need to understand object-oriented concepts and the tools that are available to them such as UML. Jacquies book does an excellent job of introducing the reader to those concepts and explaining them clearly. It has been said that you cannot explain something well to another person unless you really understand it yourself. If that is the case, Ms. Barker clearly understands object design very well. If you are learning Java or considering learning Java for the first time, I recommend reading these books in the following order:
Beginning Java 2 (Ivor Horton)
Professional Java Programming (Brett Spell)
Beginning Java Objects (Jacquie Barker)
These three Wrox titles complement one another very well, and are all well-written and easy to understand.
【翻译内容】 经验告诉我,那些没有面向对象编程经验的人在初学Java时,总会错误地以为只要把这门语言本身学好就够了。事实上,最重要的(在我看来也是最困难的)不在于此,而在于如何做出优秀的面向对象的设计。为了做出优秀的设计,人们必得先理解面向对象的概念,学会使用常用的面向对象的工具如UML等。Jacquie的这本书一方面很努力地向读者灌输了这些概念,同时也把这些概念讲解得很透彻。人们不是常说,除非你自己搞明白了,否则你也不可能教会别人。真是如此的话,Barker先生是真正明白如何做出优秀的对象设计的。 假如你正在学Java,或者打算学一学Java,那我推荐你按下面书目顺序来读书: Beginning Java 2 (Ivor Horton) Professional Java Programming (Brett Spell) Beginning Java Objects (Jacquie Barker) 这三本Wrox的书相互补充不足之处,配合得很好,而且每本都写得通顺,容易理解。
|
|
此评论对你有用
没用
|
| |
|
|
|